Analysis of recent case law on the restriction of the concept of “consumer”

Bucharest Court concludes that, given that the applicants have contracted loans in order to purchase property to conduct investment, and not to satisfy their interests as private final consumers, they are not a consumer within the meaning of EU law and, a fortiori, since Law no. 193/2000 is the enactment of transposition into national law of the Directive 93/13/CEE, not in the meaning of Law no. 193/2000.

The author analyses the impact of a recent ruling on future jurisprudence in the area of consumer law.

Source: Silvia Uscov, Published on (in Romanian)


Comments are closed.