Some clarifications regarding the solution of inadmissibility against interim ruling of the preliminary chamber judge pronounced under Article 345 New Criminal Procedure Code
As stated in the title, the article brings clarifications regarding the solution of inadmissibility against interim ruling of the preliminary chamber judge pronounced under Article 345 New Criminal Procedure Code.
If only part of the exceptions raised in the preliminary chamber procedure are admitted, the contestation regarding the manner of solving them is submitted both against the final ruling by which the preliminary chamber procedure is terminated pronounced under Article 346 New Criminal Procedure Code and against interim ruling by which the exceptions are solved pronounced under Article 345 New Criminal Procedure Code.
Therefore, also the interim ruling pronounced under Article 345 New Criminal Procedure Code can be challenged, however not separately, but only together with the ruling by which the preliminary chamber procedure is terminated pronounced under Article 346 New Criminal Procedure Code, otherwise the contestation shall be rejected as inadmissible.
Source: Published on Juridice.ro (in Romanian)
